Jobs being born right now, while everyone counts what is disappearing

Every report tallies the threatened jobs. I collected the opposite list: roles that did not exist two years ago, and what it takes to move into them.

AA Abdelilah Arahal
5 min read Updated 20 September 2026

Every report you read counts the jobs that will vanish. The opposite list is less dramatic and more useful, because you can act on it.

These are roles I see genuinely in demand, which did not exist in this form two years ago.

The roles, and what they actually mean

Context engineer. Not "prompt engineer", a title that has already narrowed. The real role is broader: designing what the system sees before it answers. Which documents, in what order, chunked how, and what is excluded. This determines a system's quality more than the choice of model does.

Output evaluator. Someone who builds test sets and measures whether the system actually improved or merely seemed to. This has existed in labs for years and is now moving into ordinary companies.

AI governance lead. Someone who answers: what data goes in, who reviews, who is accountable. Acutely needed in regulated sectors.

Agent workflow designer. Someone who decides where machine work ends and human work begins, and designs the checkpoints.

Internal trainer. The role I see most in demand relative to supply in this region, and I speak from direct experience. Organisations buy tools then discover three people use them.

Arabic language data specialist. Someone who builds and evaluates Arabic data for training and testing. A genuine scarcity and a widening market.

The skill that unites them

Notice the pattern: all of them require understanding a domain plus enough technical understanding, not the reverse.

Which is good news for anyone who thinks they are late. An accountant who understands models well is worth more than a model engineer who does not understand accounting, because the first knows what is worth building and the second only knows how to build it.

Where the demand actually sits, approximately
Building and training models12
Engineering systems around models45
Connecting technology to the business88
Training and enabling teams76
Governance and compliance68
An illustrative distribution based on what I see in the regional market, not a statistical survey. The point is that the middle layer is far larger than assumed.

How to move into one

None of this needs a new certificate. It needs evidence.

Build something small in your own field. Not a generic project. An accountant builds a tool that classifies invoices; a teacher builds one that generates assessment questions. A project a hiring manager understands is worth more than a technically impressive one they do not.

Document what failed. The thing that most distinguishes a candidate in this field is being able to say "I tried this and it did not work, for this reason". It proves you actually engaged with the problem.

Learn to measure before you learn to build. Someone who can prove their system improved with numbers gets ahead of someone who can build a prettier one.

Prompt
I work in [your field] with experience in [describe it in two sentences]. Suggest three small projects I could build in two weeks, such that: 1. They solve a real problem people in my field recognise. 2. They need no model training, only intelligent use of an existing model. 3. Their success can be measured with a clear number. For each: the problem, the solution in three steps, how I measure success, and what will be hard about it. Order them easiest to hardest, and ask me what you need to know about my field.

The honest part

Some of these titles will not survive. "Prompt engineer" appeared and nearly disappeared as a standalone title within two years, because the skill dissolved into other jobs.

Titles are temporary. The skill underneath is not: describing a business problem precisely enough to be solved automatically, and judging whether the solution works. That will not disappear, whatever the badge says.

In closing

New jobs are not announced in the news. They appear in job adverts with confused titles, written by people who do not yet know what to call what they want.

Start today with one thing: open a job site and search "AI" within your own sector rather than technology generally. Read five complete adverts. You will learn more about the market than any report will tell you.

And if you want a structured route across, that is what the training programmes were designed for.

Common questions

Which new roles has AI created?
Context engineer, output evaluator, governance lead, agent workflow designer, internal trainer, and Arabic language data specialist. All sit between the technology and the real work rather than in model building.
Do I need a technical qualification?
No. You need evidence: a small project in your own field solving a problem people there recognise, with a clear measure of success and documentation of what failed.
What is the most valuable combination of skills?
Understanding a specific domain plus enough technical understanding. An accountant who understands models is worth more than a model engineer who does not understand accounting, because the first knows what is worth building.
Will these job titles last?
Some will not. "Prompt engineer" appeared and nearly vanished as a standalone title within two years because the skill dissolved into other roles. Titles are temporary; the underlying skill is not.
How do I find out what my sector wants?
Search "AI" within your own sector rather than technology generally, and read five complete job adverts. Adverts with confused titles are usually the truest signal of genuinely new demand.
Share

No comments yet

Leave a comment

Never published. Used only if I reply to you directly.

Comments are read before they appear.

Related reading

12 min read

The best framework for building AI agents in 2026

Seventeen agent frameworks, ranked by what survives production rather than by GitHub stars. Some of the most popular names sit in the bottom tier, and one of them is a security incident waiting to happen.

Start with a short call

Fifteen minutes to understand what your team does and what you want to change. If training is not the right answer, I will say so.